In a recent
letter to the editor “Ventilatory modes. What’s in a name?”[1] Authors provide
a strong argument for the need to standardize terminology in regards to
mechanical ventilation and propose an oversimplified classification system
specifically for non-invasive ventilatory devices. I applaud the authors for
their call to action; conversely their viewpoint is neither novel nor
applicable to ventilator taxonomy.
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Thursday, January 17, 2013
FiO2 Titration Augmented by Artificial Intelligence
I have been
a Registered Respiratory Therapist for greater than twelve years and have never
considered the titration of oxygen a big deal. Furthermore, practicing at >
10 different facilities in eight different States I have never needed to be prompted
by a physician or surveillance system to titrate the FiO2 during mechanical.
Fortunately, I have only worked at facilities with respiratory care practitioner
driven protocols. So when two recent articles were published on the subject
within the last month I took notice [1, 2].
Labels:
commentary
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Simplifying Mechanical Ventilation
From Global Nerdy @ www.globalnerdy.com |
In a recent
letter to the editor “Ventilatory modes. What’s in a name?”[1] Authors provide
a strong argument for the need to standardize terminology in regards to
mechanical ventilation and propose an oversimplified classification system
specifically for non-invasive ventilatory devices. I applaud the authors for
their call to action; conversely their viewpoint is neither novel nor
applicable to ventilator taxonomy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)